“I’m obsessed with skincare,” Úrsula Corberó confessed to Naty Jota during her appearance on Olga. In the midst of the conversation, the Spanish actress also revealed which device-based treatment she tends to choose to care for her skin.
“I use Indiba a lot. It’s amazing, I recommend it. It’s a device-based treatment,” she explained.
The mention sparked interest because it is a technology that has long been part of facial aesthetic treatments. But what exactly is it and what does it aim to achieve?
What is the treatment Úrsula Corberó chooses
INDIBA is the commercial name for a radiofrequency technology that operates at a characteristic frequency of 448 kHz. In facial aesthetics it is used via a head that glides over the skin and generates a controlled thermal effect in the tissues.
The objective is to improve the quality and overall appearance of the skin. Among its cosmetic applications are work on firmness and elasticity, in addition to reducing the appearance of fine lines and achieving a brighter, more luminous skin.
Radiofrequency, in general terms, can stimulate processes linked to fibroblast activity and collagen production. However, results depend on the equipment used, the protocol, and the characteristics of each skin.
Who is it for?
This type of treatment can be interesting for those looking to improve mild signs of sagging, elasticity, or skin quality without resorting to invasive procedures.
One of its features is precisely that it does not require surgery or a prolonged recovery period. During the session you usually feel heat in the treated area and, depending on the protocol, the experience may vary.
That said, being a non-invasive treatment does not mean it is suitable for everyone. Indications and parameters should be defined by a trained professional after evaluating the skin.
INDIBA and HIFU: they’re not the same
Although they often appear together in discussions about treatments to combat sagging, INDIBA and HIFU use different technologies.
While INDIBA works via radiofrequency, HIFU — high-intensity focused ultrasound — concentrates energy at specific depths of the tissues. Its aesthetic goal is more related to tightening and improving laxity, especially in areas like the lower third of the face and the neck.
HIFU is also an outpatient procedure and does not require surgery, though it can be more intense during application and may cause transient effects such as redness, sensitivity, or inflammation.
Therefore, it’s not about choosing which is “better,” but about understanding what each technology aims to treat. Radiofrequency may be more oriented toward skin quality and firmness, while HIFU targets a deeper tightening effect.
A beauty choice Úrsula recommends
Úrsula’s remark sums up a trend that has long settled in the beauty universe: device-based treatments have become part of many women’s care routines, including celebrities.
In her case, the actress was clear: her favorite treatment is INDIBA. And while her recommendation sparked curiosity, the key is to understand that no device-based treatment works the same for every skin.
Rather than chasing the fashionable treatment, the choice should start from what you want to improve and be guided by a professional evaluation that determines which technology is most appropriate.
